Sunday, June 7, 2020

whose lives matter?

 Black Lives Matter.

And it's about time that Black Lives Matter has finally gotten the international support and solidarity it deserves. It also goes to show what can happen when the possibility of real change (and fear of what will continue to happen if the status quo doesn't change) galvanizes people into action. 

So what about All Lives Matter? Because from a vegan perspective, the idea that all lives matter (including other animals, specifically) seems to be reasonable and almost self-evident. And that notion IS what drives many vegan activists, this belief that all lives are worthy. Or to borrow from this quote:

The idea that some lives matter less is the root of all that is wrong with the world. --Paul Farmer

But we have to remember context here as the rallying cry of All Lives Matter has been used too often to dismiss the BLM message. A message often misunderstood. Black Lives Matter does not mean that ONLY black lives matter, but that black lives matter TOO. And that if black lives don't matter (with systemic racism suggesting they don't), all lives can't matter.

But for some reason this has confused people in a way that other campaigns have not. For example, those who fundraise for breast cancer won't get the pushback that they're ignoring other types of cancer. It's implied that all cancers are worthy of being eradicated, but that the particular focus here is a specific form of cancer. Same for other diseases. Campaigning for Diabetes, for example, doesn't mean Alzheimer's matters less.

So I was impressed to see Steve Jenkins from Happily Ever Esther Farm Sanctuary thank the person who helped him understand why using the AllLives instead of the BlackLivesMatter hashtag was problematic, and state that he was willing to learn in order to be the best ally. Sadly though, I think a number of his followers didn't get that particular point of his post.

It takes humility to admit you may have been wrong, and strength of character to be open to growth. And isn't that what vegans hope nonvegans will do? Take information that may be new to them and consider it with an open mind? While I understand his followers defending him (because yes, Steve has a heart of gold and we see his values exemplified daily), it's a bit disheartening to see some followers continue to insist that saying All Lives Matter is absolutely fine, when actually, it isn't.

Also disheartening is that Canadians have been a bit ignorant (smug, even) in denying racism in our own backyard, as evidenced by Ontario premier Rob Ford declaring on June 2nd that Canada doesn't have the same systemic deep roots of racism that the United States does. Um, right. Thankfully he quickly backtracked on that comment after receiving massive criticism. 

But the belief in the absence of racism in Canada is something many Canadians share. And I can even see how they may have that perception. Take the small town I live in; so incredibly white it's rare to see someone in it who isn't. You almost couldn't even blame anyone here for not knowing what white privilege is, and that almost everyone in this town benefits from it. That is, of course, if you conveniently forget the historic (and current) treatment of Indigenous people. Or the internment of Japanese Canadians back in 1942. No, racism is definitely NOT absent in this country.

What does systemic racism in Canada look like? Here are five charts illustrating the challenges Black Canadians face in terms of income, employment, education, and hate crimes. Contrary to the claim that systemic racism doesn't exist in Canada, Black Canadians say racism is just as harmful on this side of the border.

Want to be an ally in the anti-racism fight? Here are some actions you can take to help in the fight against racism.

Two books I have read recently that personally have helped me to better understand the topic of race are: So You Want to Talk About Race by American author Ijeoma Oluo, and Why I'm No Longer Talking to White People About Race by UK author Reni Eddo-Lodge.  I highly recommend both.

The takeaway for vegans in particular, I think, is that we have to be willing to listen and learn. Just as the feminist movement was rightly criticized for being mainly relevant to white middle-class women, vegans have to listen when we're told that veganism is mainly relevant to white middle-class folk. (Did you hear the echo?) We have to listen, respectfully, when we're told comparisons between the animal rights movement and the civil rights movement may be problematic. We also have to pay attention when survivors of sexual assault tell us that having their experience of rape compared to artificial insemination of animals may be inappropriate.

We have to remember that the ultimate aim of veganism is to eliminate oppression, period. That includes racism, sexism, classism, ableism and a bunch of other isms too. While it may be tempting to say that you only care about animals, humans ARE animals, and we have to help end oppression of them as well.

And one way of doing that is to honour the fight for racial equality by not routinely saying all lives matter whenever you hear Black Lives Matter.

Comments

Debra Roppolo said...

Very well said.

have gone vegan said in reply to Debra Roppolo...

Thanks Debra! :)

Krissa said...

I missed a LOT of posts so I went back to the earliest one I missed and I'm trying to think of how to reply to this one because I do think you made great and valid points - and maybe it's because I'm a misanthrope that I feel the way I do (I dislike all humans equally based on only their behavior, not their color or religion or anything else other than personal behavior, which leaves me disliking more folks than not), but this topic you posted reminds me about when Morrissey got flamed so much online when he wrote about farmed animals and compared them to holocaust victims. He is 100% correct about that and I appreciate that there are vegans who are trying to understand why some black folks might not understand the All Lives Matter slogan, but they need to understand that slogan as much as any human being who isn't black needs to understand the Black Lives Matter slogan.

No human being no matter what color they are has a worse life than the non-human animals we have all enslaved, exploited, tortured and abused since we all started coexisting on this planet.

I know that racism and sexism share many common traits with speciesism and that all of those isms are wrong and need to be eradicated. I just feel like now more than ever, our fellow beings are more in danger because of so many things going on in this world.

There was a time in my life - and I didn't realize this until recently when I was talking with my brothers - when all the friends I had that I spent time with were gay black men. I didn't even think about it at the time, they were (and some still are) my friends and I didn't see the demographics of that. I know the struggles some of them went through that are more than a lot of the rest of us can even understand. And at the same time, they are at the top of the pyramid simply for being human.

So for me personally, All Lives Matter is something that every human being needs to make an effort to understand and it's a little scary and sad to me that folks who have been mistreated so much by other humans don't have more understanding and empathy with other creatures than the rest of us do. Maybe Native Americans, but even though they aren't vegan culturally/historically...they at least recognized and showed respect that they were killing another life when they killed other animals.

I'm so sorry if this comment came off in a way I didn't intend. I absolutely know that everything you wrote is valid and is the way the whole thing has to be approached. I'm just sorry for our fellow beings that humans are so ridiculous that it's even an issue for anyone to say All Lives Matter at any point in history, now or before now or later. But yes...the road to finally making things better for other animals is tied to our species - and we clearly can't get things right even between ourselves.

Thanks for posting again! I'm sorry I'm so far behind and I don't know how quickly I can catch up, but thanks for speaking up for those who need a voice now more than ever!

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

Hi Krissa, so I'm trying to think of how to reply to this comment (just as you were trying to think of how to reply to this post), and I want to begin by saying to others who may be reading that Krissa happens to be a friend of mine, so I absolutely know her heart to be in the right place.

I'm also going to put up a few links at the bottom of this comment that explains this issue better than I could, and may even put them up in a separate post as well, as I think I know how it may be confusing to vegans (who I believe use the slogan All Lives Matter in a different way than non-vegans) as to why continuing to use this slogan at this particular point in time is problematic.

So first, vegans using ALM (I'm going to use the abbreviated version from now on) typically think of other animals when saying 'all lives', whereas I don't think non-vegans do. In essence then, saying ALM serves to dismiss or cancel out Black Lives Matter. And while some vegans may be more intersectional in their approach, too many aren't, and sadly (and incorrectly) feel that animal rights activism shouldn't include concern for human rights at all.

The analogy that I've often seen used to explain why saying ALM isn't appropriate is the 'house on fire' one. Basically, if one house in a neighbourhood is on fire, it is appropriate to focus all attention on trying to put out that particular fire, and not worry about the other houses. One could argue that All Houses Matter, but in this instance the house on fire gets priority. Another analogy I've seen is the lifeguard one. If a person is drowning, then that person gets helped, not everyone else in the pool.

So to quote from the first article linked at bottom: "When someone counters “Black Lives Matter” with “All Lives Matter,” it’s appropriate to use the metaphor of a neighborhood: if someone’s house is on fire, while others are not, whose house is the priority? Similarly, choosing to insist that “All Lives Matter,” including those of non-human animals, is not technically wrong, but still distracts from and diffuses the potential impacts of an important and necessary racial justice movement."

In the second link at the bottom, the author of Stop Comparing Black Lives Matter to Animal Rights, makes the powerful argument that non-black vegans should NEVER make that comparison, saying: "Why? The reasons why are multiple, but let me start with the most basic: You already enjoy the opportunities and privileges that Black people are fighting for."

They end with, "Please, vegans with privilege, I’m asking you to join me: Show up and fight racism without equivocation, suppress that impulse to compare the plight of non-human animals to the plight of your fellow humans, see that society’s compassion will never extend to animals before it extends to all humans, and recognize your privilege as a non-Black vegan to fight for animal rights without having to also fight for your own rights."

The third link includes 9 different explanations as to why we should stop saying ALM, which means that something should resonate with everyone, hopefully.

Krissa, I think you nailed it on the head when you said, "...the road to finally making things better for other animals is tied to our species - and we clearly can't get things right even between ourselves", and I think that points out the importance of tackling racism. Doesn't mean that we as white vegans don't tackle speciesism as well, but that we do understand the need for those who aren't as privileged to prioritize differently.

link 1) https://sentientmedia.org/protesters-pigs-the-diversity-problem-in-animal-welfare/

link 2) https://medium.com/tenderlymag/stop-comparing-black-lives-matter-to-animal-rights-59a640d741f1

link 3) https://www.vox.com/2016/7/11/12136140/black-all-lives-matter

Krissa said...

Thanks for your reply and I hope/wonder if it can be a post of its own (?).

I've been getting madder and madder and madder watching humans who I know in my personal life who don't care about "others" (whether that be a different race or different species) speak up about things that they are simply mimickng to try to jump on a bandwagon.


Your reply deserves a better reply than I'm writing here, but I am too emotional about all this to write something intelligent. That is one of the reasons that I thank you again for being the voice for those who can not speak for themselves because of who they are.

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

Hi Krissa! Thanks for checking back in again and glad you were able to see the comment. Yes, I'm working on making it into a separate post, which will now end up being two posts as I had a bunch of pre-post things to say as well. In other words, too many words, snort.

(And I was inspired to start another post as well. Not sure where this impulse to write - after being silent for over a year - comes from, but I guess I have to honour it.)

Yeah, I know how frustrating it can be to watch folk simply say slogans without having their heart in it. Worse though is those who completely refute not only the words but the ideas as well. I really think we're at a critical juncture and if we as a species can't get our shit together when it comes to racism and sexism for starters, then we're in even more trouble than we realize.

I'm hoping my follow-up posts will explain things a bit further in depth (you can only say so much in a comment), and help show why the BLM movement is so critical to the work that vegans as allies have to do.

Thanks, as always, for your comments. I know we don't always agree on every point, but diversity of opinion makes every movement and every friendship richer, methinks. Hugs to you!

Krissa said...

Hi again.. sorry we're about to make a whole thread here, but maybe it's not even that bad in the event that there are lurkers. First, I really hope you have the time to make a follow-up post to this and also to make other posts.

Something I thought of as regards our like-mindedness and also sometimes not seeing things the same is that we live in places that are sooooo different. When I was in the States, I lived all over the place and what I consider home (Pendleton, IN) is probably close to what you go through. You know I lived in NYC, L.A., etc. but anyway...

Before I lived in Berlin, I would not have seen so many things that I see on a daily basis and I think that is making me even more firm in my beliefs/opinions that you and I maybe don't agree on. It sounds 'simple', but I think that might be it. If not, and if this is just me without any outside influence...that's fine, too. But there are things I see every day and experience every day that are so far past what I was used to (and not in a good way) and I think it has made me become even more close to our non-human family than I already was.

Your voice and insight are needed now more than ever for our fellow beings. And I understand that if we can't get it right among ourselves, that's not helpful for anything and dangerous in ways that affect our non-human family (we see things on the news here every day that make that clear). Just keep speaking up as often and as loud as you can for those who don't have a voice. You already do that, I know. 💛👍🌎 Thank you!!!

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

Hey kiddo, just put up follow-up post part A now, with hopefully part B to follow in the next couple of days. Maybe we can continue the discussion over there?

p.s. I once heard or read something along this line in response to the idea that animals don't have a voice: they do, but humans just don't listen. That has always stuck with me. :)

Emm said...

George Floyd's sister says 'all lives matter'. And they do, including animal's lives. A fire department would put out whichever house was on fire because All Fires Matter. A lifeguard would rescue whichever swimmer was drowning because, All drowning swimmers matter. All lives matter helps whichever race is in need of help. It is inclusive. Yes of course black lives matter - all lives matter. The racial response to black lives matter is white lives matter and not all lives matter.

Have GoneVegan said in reply to Emm...

Thanks for commenting. May I respectfully suggest that you read the follow-up posts below (part A, and especially, part B) before we continue this dialogue? Thank you.

https://www.havegonevegan.com/2020/08/whose-lives-matter-continued-black-lives-matter.html

https://www.havegonevegan.com/2020/08/whose-lives-matter-continued-part-b-.html

This link is also helpful: https://www.vox.com/2016/7/11/12136140/black-all-lives-matter

Sunday, June 17, 2018

when almost every day could be 'mothering your mother' day

 Note: this post was originally scheduled for Mother's Day, but time got away from me (as it often does these days) and since there are plenty of folk who are fathering their father, I thought I'd publish it now...

Demean. Demeanor. Dement. Demented. Dementia. Demerit. Those were the surrounding words I found in my dictionary1 when looking up the term dementia. All neutral or negative, which isn't surprising given that the definition of dementia itself (Irreversible deterioration of intellectual faculties with concomitant emotional disturbance resulting from organic brain disorder.) isn't positive either. 

This was the diagnosis given to my mother back in December. Also not too surprising given her age (90) and her obviously failing memory and occasional confusion. (Technically, Mom suffers from mild cognitive decline, which doesn't sound too bad, but can pack a wallop in terms of how it impacts daily functioning.) 

mom and dad when young

Still, it was a bit of a shock to discover just how bad things had progressed. We had assumed, when she'd gotten a call for a room at the assisted living retirement residence where I work, that she would pass the required Mini-Mental State Exam. But just to be sure, we downloaded the test and administered it ourselves only to quickly find out that answering the question, "What is the year? Season? Date? Day? Month?" would be her undoing. No problem. Mom had two days to study and practice, and practice for hours she did.

(Sadly, time disorientation occurs fairly early in this illness, and many folk have told a story about a person with dementia practicing the day, month and year all the way to the doctor's office, only to forget when they are asked during the assessment.2)

The result? 3/5. For the question, "Where are we now? Province? Country? Town? Hospital? Floor?" the score was 2/5. Mom was kindly re-administered the test by the retirement home, only to score even lower than the first time at the doctor's office. 

To this day Mom maintains that of course she couldn't remember the year because unlike everyone else, she doesn't have a daily newspaper informing her of the date. Never mind that we had recently installed a computer monitor with a permanent screen shot of the day, time and year. And never mind explaining to her that most people, newspaper or not, have no problem identifying the current year when asked.

To be honest though, as awful as getting a diagnosis of dementia sounds, it was also a relief. Finally, we could use the right term. Finally, family members could all be on the same page where Mom's memory was concerned, and not have to convince each other (convincing her is a different story altogether) that there was a problem.

Because if there was one thing our mom still excelled at was hiding her difficulty, especially with outsiders like doctors. Now at least it was in black and white that Mom's noggin wasn't quite what it used to be. That in short, her short-term memory is getting shot to hell.

Even though we may use the term memory often enough, and most people tend to think of memory as one function, there are in fact, many types of memory processes including immediate, short-term, long-term, emotional and procedural, with short-term memory often being the first affected in individuals with Alzheimer's disease. 3

What did we do next? We held a family meeting, discussed options, and decided that I would take a one-year leave of absence from work to be her personal caregiver. I had already taken over some tasks (like driving her to appointments, dispensing her pills, checking mail, vacuuming, and changing her bedding), but am quickly taking over more care. For starters, making hot meals and ensuring that she actually eats them. And as time progresses and Mom continues her slow decline (we now realize that symptoms started years ago and that her dementia is of the slow progressing kind), so will our assistance.

DSCF7599

Is helping to look after Mom rewarding work? In a way. It has its satisfying moments, and certainly you know you're doing the right thing. But it can also be stressful, tiring, frustrating, annoying, aggravating and difficult. And that, of course, is for both parties.

Not always being able to come up with the right words means that you talk about things in a roundabout way. "The big store" now could mean either the grocery store or the drugstore, and only relying on the context will tell you which one she means. The name of one of her aunts is now often used instead of my sister's name, and "say hello to your dad" (my dad died three years ago), means I need to pass on her greetings to my brother. And because she can't remember, a lot of things get repeated, and repeated, and then repeated some more.

Numbers, especially, don't always make sense anymore, and the easy-enough-sounding question of what year it is, is tricky precisely because the number 2018 doesn't hold much meaning. It's also, unfortunately, the punch-in code for a number of doors at the building where she does a fair bit of visiting. So now that number is written on her purses and walker, because being told to punch in the current year for her is like being told to ride a bike. Except that in this case, the adage of 'it's like riding a bike' no longer holds.

So what does any of this have to do with veganism? Well, lots. Even though this is an experience that I'm currently going through (and I tell ya, learning to deal with dementia is one hell of a learning curve indeed), many people my age, women especially, are experiencing variations of exactly the same thing, as parents of boomers are booming at an exponential rate.

But there are a few parallels between being vegan and being a caregiver that I now see more clearly, with one of the major ones centering on grieving.

The insidious nature of dementia (although Alzheimer's is its most common form, we're not actually sure what type Mom has) means that it's often developing slowly enough that it doesn't get properly diagnosed until it directly effects functioning. It also has no cure, and you know that the process (never mind the ending) will not be pleasant. 

In my mom's case, knowing how hard and tiring it already is in this comparatively "easy" stage, and knowing that you can't stop it from becoming even worse, engenders some of the same feelings of helplessness and hopelessness that I sometimes feel as a vegan. As much as I can do, I can't save many animals, if practically any, from a horrible fate that they don't deserve.

I can't protect the animals I see dead on the road, I can't protect the untold billions about to be slaughtered, and except for changing my own habits and hoping to influence others, I don't feel I have much power. As for our mom, the only thing we can do is provide as much personal care as we can, and hope for a speedy demise from anything but the dementia itself.

Imagine that! Wishing for someone's death (Mom, by the way, has expressed that she is more than ready to go, having a number of physical ailments that also interfere with her quality of life) because it's much kinder than what this disease will mete out if she doesn't.

It's a peculiar kind of grieving that you do when someone has dementia. A sudden unexpected death is hard to deal with no matter what, but a gradual dying away of a person right in front of you brings its own set of challenges, and a continual process of grieving before physical death even takes place.

You could call it anticipatory grieving because you know what's coming up, but with dementia you're grieving losses as you go. The first time they forget your birthday. The first time they forget your name. That one smarts a bit, but you already know that will pale in comparison to how it'll feel when they forget who you even are.

It's the protracted and compounding grief that's hard to take. And for a control freak like me, the constantly changing nature of what she can and cannot remember, can and cannot do, is enough to drive me around the bend. As soon as you think you have a handle on something, it's already morphing into something else. Plus the seemingly never-ending contradictions between what is said one day to the next (even something minutely small like, 'I love strawberries' vs. 'I hate strawberries' - which one is it?) and the ever-increasing gaps in language and memory making it hard at times to even figure out what she's talking about, is plain tiring. On the other hand, she can still talk. Because even that will eventually go away, if, God forbid, she lives long enough.

And maybe I'm wrong comparing the grieving process, but isn't constant grieving part of what vegans have to cope with? Death and suffering on an untold scale that isn't seen or mourned by most others. Isn't viewed as a legitimate cause of concern. Being vegan can be stressful when you focus on all those lives at stake, when what you do seems pitiful in comparison to the sweeping changes needed.  Burnout is common for both vegans and caregivers, so what about those who are both?

It's a lot of stress. A lot of grief. And incredibly tiring. With my mom at least, there's a definite end in sight. With changing systems to make life better for those oppressed, that'll be a lifetime of work. In the meantime, most of my energy these days goes to trying to help the woman seen above. We weren't particularly close as I was growing up, and not wanting children of my own I certainly never foresaw mothering anyone, so this may be the closest I get to that role.

And while grieving takes many forms, it would be wise to remember that grief is not species-specific. Think of all the cows grieving when their calves are unfairly taken away, sows separated from nursing piglets, elephants remembering their deceased kin, and the grief recently shared by the residents and friends of HEEFS, just to name a few examples. Sharing your heart with another living being, regardless of species, means it'll get broken at some point. Opening your heart to the vast, systemic, and often brutal slaughter of billions to satisfy the needless wants of one species, means it'll break over and over.

Esther  Shelby and Reuben

So maybe instead of paying lip service and celebrating Mother's Day and Father's Day once a year, we could actually take the roles of mothering and fathering (whether that type of care is directed toward the young or old) a bit more seriously, and include in our consideration of those roles species other than our own. Parenting, and the inevitable grief that comes with it, should not be deemed important only for humans. And the emotions of beings of other species, even if they're not always exactly similar to our own, should not be discounted either. Grief is grief, love is love.

Happy mothering and/or fathering to everyone, and a special Happy Father's Day to the two awesome dads of the pups and pig above! :)

======================================================

The Houghton Mifflin Canadian Dictionary of the English Language

2Thoughtful Dementia Care. Understanding the Dementia Experience, Jennifer Ghent-Fuller p97

Comments

Krissa said...

((Hugs)) to you! I'll keep hoping that things are the best they can be for you, your family and your mom....but I know it's got to be rough and I have a better idea after reading this post what you go through day to day.

The photo of Esther and Shelby and Reuben is sweet and yeah, knowing that Esther and her family are having to grieve their loss is sad. I'm sorry you're going through that what you describe about watching it gradually happen and having all the individual griefs along the way. The part about the first time they forget your name, gulp. I hadn't ever even thought of it that way.

Sending lots of hugs, love and moral support your way! I hope today was one of the better days!

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

Thank you Krissa! :)

There are a couple of issues going on right now (won't go into details) that are making it even tougher at the moment, but day by day is about all we can do.

Thanks again for all your continued support. Appreciate it!

Krissa said...

P.S. I forgot to mention how awesome it is to see your mom reading Esther's childrens book!!!! I loved that!

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

Sweet, isn't it? :)

Hi Friend,

Great article. I think about the parent/child relationship a lot. What is our responsibility individually and as a society to take care of our elderly parents? In my own situation, I have one parent for whom I would have done anything and everything and one for whom I would not. Did I still I have a responsibility to take care of my father who used and abused his family? I helped him out for many years even though I was slowly disentangling myself from any misplaced love I felt for him over the years.

I commend you for your devotion to your mother and her care. I have a friend with dementia and even though I am not responsible for her care, her situation weighs heavily on me when I go to visit her at the facility at which she lives.

I get what you are saying about the grief for exploited animals. It is ever present in my mind. I guess that is why we do what we do.

Take care,
Anne

Thanks Anne!

Yeah, it's tough, knowing what responsibility you have with parents, especially those that didn't do the greatest job parenting you. My own mom, in particular, is still affected (haunted almost) by the less than optimal relationship she had with her mom, who's been dead for decades now.

So in part, taking care of her is my way of trying to get some closure and healing, because I don't want to have to still be grappling with mother issues when I'm 90 myself, snort. But it's hard. Mom's coping habits haven't changed, so she still lashes out and can be verbally abusive when frustrated. I try not to take it personally, and since she's not going to change, I have to be the one to be the bigger person, not that I always succeed. It's an odd role reversal, and one that's not easy for either one of us.

In the end, I hope to have become a better person for it, but if not, I guess I could always finally drag myself to a therapist, ha ha.

veganelder said...

Ouch...I feel for you. Much.

Reading your excellent post made me think of something I figured out when I was parenting...a child offers the opportunity to whomever is doing the parenting to grapple with their own unfinished business.

You mentioned being a "control freak" (mine was patience). When my daughter was young I ran into myself again and again in respect to my lousy skill at being patient. Once I figured out there was a chance for me to struggle with my own stuff...her rubbing my nose in my own deficiency became an opportunity.

And.

Dealing with the bunnies at the rescue is much much easier for me because I actually did get better at the being patient thingee.

I wonder if parenting and/or bunny care and/or dealing with any being with less power than I have isn't much the same whether it's a child or bunny or parent who is not able to function as well as they once could. It's all about learning how to relate in an asymmetrical power relationship where you're the one with the greatest amount of 'power'. (power might not be the right word but I don't know how to express it any better right now)

Does that make sense? I think it does but I'm uncertain.

Hang in there...and good for you.

have gone vegan said in reply to veganelder...

Thank you veganelder.

Patience, along with control, is another area that could use a lot more work, snort, so yes, I'm definitely getting lots of practice in dealing with unfinished business.

At the same time, I'm also recognizing more that some of the less pleasant stuff that comes up with mom may be her trying to sort out her unfinished and end-of-life issues, so again, more patience on my part would be helpful.

It's a peculiar, gratifying, guilt-inducing, at times satisfying, difficult but hopefully makes-you-stronger journey that I may look upon more fondly once it's over, ha ha.

Thanks again.

Sunday, May 28, 2017

hiatus interruptus: when words fail

 Came across a passage in a book recently (I read daily no matter what else is going on in my life) lamenting how we don't have a real word for men who kill women, whereas the term "man-hater" is used so often you would think actual harm is caused by those accused of being one. And even though not new, this observation still strikes me every time I see it. They also rightly asserted that while we do have "misogynist", this too clinical and too academic-sounding word doesn't do the concept justice. 

It's ironic that man-hater is usually directed at those who don't actually hate men, but who do object to hateful actions that hurt everyone. Man-hater is especially lobbed against those who question the status quo, and who fight to eradicate gender inequality. Actually, no, you just have to look like you're not living up to outdated gender expectations and you can expect to have this word spat out at you. Feminist is another term that when not used by like-minded peers, is more apt to be hissed, snarled, or accompanied by spittle than merely said. Just like the term "man-hater", these words are often hurled in anger or contempt. Fear too, because how dare people, women especially, assert their right not to be subservient. An interesting word, subservient, as you can practically see the words serve, servile and servant floating within it.

Man-hater. But if you think about it, how many acts of physical violence resulting in bodily harm or death are caused by these so-called man-haters? How many injuries, rapes, other sexual assaults, or murders? Leaving verbal and other forms of violence aside for now, how much physical damage do victims of man-hating actually endure? 

Then think about the instances of physical assault, sexual assault, rape and death experienced by women. Without even looking up statistics, I know the numbers are staggering and frightening, but woman-hater isn't a term that's regularly used to describe the perpetrators of these acts. One could argue however, that evidence indicates we live in a rape culture, which is part of a larger woman-hating culture. So why is the more accurate term woman-hater rarely used?

Another word that I almost never see used relates to dehumanization. Loosely defined, to dehumanize refers to an act or process of depriving a person or group of human qualities. A terrible thing, obviously. A synonym for this is animalize, meaning to cause to be or act like an animal. Leaving aside the inherent anthropocentric bias (we've all heard phrases like, they're no better than animals!), why (and this is more of a rhetorical question) do we not use the term deanimalize to describe a similar process against animals? 

A paltry 2,540 results when Googled, it seems to me that this lack of acknowledgement of the horrendous injustice done to individual beings and groups on a daily and worldwide basis deserves greater use of the term. We routinely strip animals of their animalhood (personhood some would even say), that is, the essential qualities that make them a sentient being and not an object, and don't give it a second thought. It begins with the use of the word "it" to describe most animals instead of he or she, words like pork instead of pig, beef instead of cow, television commercials about eggs that don't even show or mention chickens, and of course the routine farming practices we all abhor. Language is twisted and doesn't include the appropriate naming of what would be considered theft, kidnapping, rape and murder if the victims were human.

Animals, male and female, old and young, sick and healthy, are instead treated as inanimate objects, products of consumption and cogs of a vast and vile agricultural machine. In short, living beings with their own interests are rendered invisible, and the very act of invisibling is made invisible for most people as well. So another word almost completely missing from our vocabulary is animal-hater, and really, what word better describes a person who kidnaps and kills without fear of punishment because of a victim's species? Animal-hating (even though it isn't defined as such) is very much a part of our culture and that of others, so it seems absurd to have many who condone animal cruelty refer to themselves as animal-lover simply because they favour a couple of specific species. Love isn't even necessary; animal-respecter would be nice enough.

Man-hater, animal-lover. Woman-hater, animal-hater. So much hate, but not enough words to identify accurately where the real hatred is coming from, and whom it's actually aimed at. A lot of fakery in other words, and sadly, in today's political climate, even the word "fake" is now failing. The difference between fake and genuine was once more easily discerned, but nowadays fake seems to be applied by some to anything they don't want to hear. In some ways even topsy-turvy is now better thought of as turvy-topsy, as if things weren't bad enough before.

Words fail when they mean the exact opposite, when they conceal what's really going on, and when we don't even have proper names to describe what's happening. Words in this post fail too, of course, because of what I've left out. While I've talked (the words briefly outlined would perhaps be more accurate) about some of the words that fail women and animals, I haven't even touched upon words that fail humans who, for example, aren't white. And I haven't mentioned the most important word, the word that's at the heart of misnaming or not naming at all, and the word at the root of harm to different groups of beings whether based on categories like class, race, gender, ability, orientation or even species.

I love words, but even I often fail to do them, and you the reader, any real justice.

Comments

Krissa said...

"So another word almost completely missing from our vocabulary is animal-hater". This. This hit me so much seeing it in words! I'd copy and paste the whole paragraph that follows that sentence here because I love what you wrote so much and have felt it but haven't put it into those words in a coherent way yet, but instead I will just say thank you for putting this into such eloquent words!

The thing that never occurred to me though is your point about the term "animal lover". I know that I've felt guilty (for lack of a better word) since becoming Esther Approved / vegan ... because I always did consider myself to be an "animal lover". When in reality, I was basically, for real, an animal hater. Because my love was so one dimensional and shallow regardless of how close I was to any individual dog or cat or bird that was brought into the various households I lived in over those years.

I appreciate this post so much! And I also share your views about everything at the beginning of this post, but I don't even have the knowledge to begin to address it. I realize it is definitely a part of the whole vegan reality, it is just too big for me to be intelligent about in a comment. Well, maybe intelligent isn't a good word. But the concept/connection don't come to me easily other than in my head. Exactly the same way that "animal lover" and "animal hater" didn't. Thanks for taking the time to put things like this into words!

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

You're welcome, and thanks. :)

I had to laugh though, because when I reread the paragraph I realized that one sentence didn't even make sense. Changed the phrase "without impunity" to "without fear of punishment" because even though the phrase usually used is with impunity (so much for proofreading, ha ha), in this case most instances of harming animals are not generally punishable offences and therefore "with impunity" doesn't actually apply.

But yeah, animal hating is so normalized that we don't think of it as such, just like we don't identify woman hating when it happens. And I'm sure there are those (vegans included) who would argue that it's not hatred as much as it is being oblivious, but I find it interesting how the term animal-lover is said so easily and so frequently that it has basically lost all meaning. Maybe we should ask those who use it exactly what they mean when they say it, what specific animals they love, and in what context.

And even though animal-hater might me too strong or perhaps not always accurate, I think if people used the terms animal-hater and woman-hater when it clearly does apply, the shock value might jolt some folk into thinking a bit more.

veganelder said...

I'm too bumfuzzled by most everything lately but something I've noticed again and again is that groups with power (social and/or other kinds) are the ones who control language and thinking and whats ok and whI ran across a brief video talk by Walter Mignolo recently (he's described as a semiotician...which means someone who studies "meaning making"...snazzy, eh?) and he was presenting a very abbreviated and condensed version of colonization and he noted that colonization (along with capitalism) led to the turning of life and living beings into some sort of commodity...meaning that they became instead of something having an intrinsic value and meaning all their own that they could be equated to some monetary value and bought and sold and exchanged and valued greatly or not at all.

He noted that the western Europeans "discovered" this "new" world and with all that land they needed labor and at's not and so on. I wonder if all the words (and absent words) you write about might gain some bit of greater clarity if they were thought about in relation to the power of the groups involved in their use...or their lack of existence. "Man-hater"...for instance...that's a word wielded by the group with power (men) to denigrate and intimidate and maybe shame those who resist and/or oppose them. No word for those who kill women? Well...mostly that's men (right?) and men have the power and a widely used word for a woman killer might denigrate or serve to put men down so...voila...no widely used and/or recognized term.

I've not thought a whole whole bunch about the power thingee but I have enough to suspect that it's a pretty useful tool for thinking about a number of things, not just the presence or absence of widely used terms, ya know? For instance, one thing I'm nervous about anymore is paying much heed to anything about a subordinated group if the originator of that information belongs to a dominant group. Make sense?

have gone vegan said in reply to veganelder...

Hi veganelder, sorry for the late reply. Ha ha, bumfuzzled. Not a word I'd heard before, but I like it!

What you say makes sense indeed. Language is almost never neutral, and yes, power is an excellent and crucial tool for analyzing almost anything. As you say, power (and those who have it) determine, among many things, what words are given credence or not. Look how long it took, for example, for a prefix to exist that didn't denote a woman's marital status. Marital rape is still considered an oxymoron by some, and if you want to get a defensive reaction, just use the term white privilege in a predominantly white group.

Yes. Asking who has the power is invaluable when looking at what words or terms are used or not, what beings are valued, whom institutions and governments really serve, and what kind of society we actually live in.

Thanks veganelder.

I just discovered your blog and really enjoy it. It is not a typical vegan blog, I like your writing and can relate to your point of view. There truly are many inequalities and not nearly enough compassion. We love to label things, so if you’re not with us, you’re with them. We group and classify things, occurrences, animals and even people. And then we fail when it really matters to use our words.

have gone vegan said in reply to Ashley Woodward...

Thanks so much Ashley!

Yep, we human animals love to label and classify. And even though veganism is all about compassion (and justice), we vegans sure can be awfully hard on each other. To the point that we sometimes "other" fellow vegans who don't share the same labels or points of view even more so than some meat-eaters "other" us. Meanwhile, the gazillions of animals used and abused don't give a damn what labels we use. It's our actions that count.