Friday, January 16, 2015

privilege

 Take a minute, and without thinking about it too much, quickly list all the different ways in which you're privileged. Better yet, do it out loud. 

Now, did you find this relatively easy, or were you a bit stumped after the first couple of more obvious privileges? If you're like most of us, you were a bit slower in rattling off the last items you came up with, and that's not surprising given the nature of privilege. Privilege tends to be relatively invisible to the privilege-holder, that is, we often don't even see the advantages that come with the particular type of privilege we enjoy. And we all enjoy numerous privileges we take for granted.

If you are currently reading this post, then you enjoy heaps of privilege right off the bat. You have time, and are likely not working in multiple part-time jobs (or sweatshops) in trying to make ends meet. You have some kind of device on which you're reading these very words, and are probably living somewhere without Internet censorship. Almost certainly, you have some level of post-secondary education, or are self-taught. Already, as you can see, you are hugely privileged.

Statistically, many of you are enjoying gender privilege (it's easier, by the way, for vegans to pay lip service to the idea of being nonsexist than it is to recognize how certain approaches that value linear or black and white thinking, or reason over emotion, may actually be rooted in sexism), racial privilege, and heterosexual privilege. What may not be as easy to see is that you likely also enjoy gender identity privilege, Judeo-Christian privilege, and able-bodied privilege. If you fit the norms of whatever is considered attractive and desirable in your culture or society, than that's privilege too.

So right away, we have all sorts of privilege that we may not even be that aware of: gender, gender identity, class, racial, economic, technological, religious, education, orientation, and so forth -- it's a bit staggering, isn't it? Which isn't to say that anyone is completely privileged, as we're all probably marginalized in one area or another, and as with anything, it's a matter of degree.

But the one enormous privilege that the vast majority of us (even those of us who can easily recognize all sorts of other privileges) don't see, is the privilege conferred on human animals. In fact, this privilege is rendered so invisible that those of us who do see the anthropocentrism for what it is are usually accused of anthropomorphism. In other words, our world is so human-centric that many cannot recognize other sentient beings as beings in their own right, and dismiss veganism as an attempt to attribute human emotions and characteristics as if those emotions and traits can only be human. It's as if most humans cannot view members of other species but through a human-specific and human-oriented lens. Quite the disability, if you ask me. ;)

My friend veganelder has also been pondering this most peculiar inability, so I would invite you to read here, here, and here.

Please do think a bit more about the notion of privilege, the extent of your own particular set of privileges, how you can help those with fewer privileges, and how you can help other humans actually see the privilege-tinted lenses they wear. Thanks.

Oh, because privilege can be hard to think about objectively when you're the one enjoying its benefits, here are a few nifty lists of examples to make it a bit clearer:

So all we need now is for someone to write a 30+ examples of human privilege list. Sadly, it shouldn't be too difficult. 

Comments

Krissa said...

I thought about VE right before you mentioned him in this post. :) ... This is something I have thought about I have no idea how many times, especially lately. I usually don't think of it in relation to things like gender privilege or the others you mentioned (and I'll check out the links!)...it's in my mind so often how much power our unworthy species has over all others. It is too much for my mind to actually comprehend if I really concentrate on it. It is the ultimate privilege to be born human on this planet and I have no idea how 'we' managed to pull this off. Instead of rambling off all the examples I see every day, I'll just say that I remember when I was a kid being told that "privileges are something you earn". Ha. Of course in the context of being allowed to do something you want to do because you did something you didn't want to (chores, etc.) they can make that fly. But our species has absolutely NOT earned the privilege that we have over everyone else. And here I go but, once again we have organized religion to in great part thank for this.

Glad to see you were able to post again! Some worthwhile things to consider here!

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

Thanks Krissa. I'm trying to keep the goals I actually didn't set (the idea being that if I DON'T set them I may have better luck), with one of them being to make/take the time to write even when I feel I don't have it. The funny thing though is that every time I DO post, I have at least one person unsubscribe within the hour, so I guess that means I'm doing something wrong, or actually something very right, snort.

I'm afraid though that it may have come across in this post that I'm completely enlightened when it comes to privilege, and that I recognize my various sorts of privilege and their consequences at all times, which is patently not the case. I'm as privilege-blind as everyone else more times than I'm comfortable with, but I think it's a concept that's useful and important, especially for vegans or anyone working to end oppression of any kind. Because if you don't see how seemingly different types of oppression are similar and interconnected (that is, the roots are the same but the affected party may be different), then you won't be as effective in whatever advocacy work you're doing.

And I agree that the human species has not earned its privilege, although it certainly is enjoying/abusing it to the detriment of others.

Krissa said in reply to have gone vegan...

That's wacky about the un-subs! It must be folks who don't even check the post out and just unsubscribe because they feel like they're getting too many emails. ? I unsubscribed to a few things lately because I was just getting way too many petitions and a good number of them nothing I would have been interested in. I just can't imagine anyone unsubbing after reading your posts!

Yep, our species hasn't earned any of the rights and privileges we enjoy and abuse. It's just nice and sanity-saving to know that there are some examples of humanity that are doing what they can to make things better for everyone else.

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

Ha ha, you're probably right, and it likely has nothing even to do with me. Taking things personally has never been one of my finer qualities, snort.

And yes, those examples are what I cling to, and try to remember or view daily. :)

veganelder said...

I'm heartened to see that this privilege notion is of interest to you. That list of links you offer is a great resource to provoke some (maybe disturbing) thinking. Thank you.

I'm really struggling with all this stuff...I find it to be disturbing and powerful and disorienting...all at the same time and that's often really uncomfortable. Jeez, no wonder we tend to stay away from looking at notions of privilege and oppression except in some more superficial ways.

It's tough...thanks for writing about this.

have gone vegan said in reply to veganelder...

It's tough indeed. Veganism isn't just about giving up consuming other animals, it's about giving up power over others, all others. It's turned out to be a tad more complicated than I thought when I went vegan nearly seven years ago, snort.

Hi Friend,
Powerful post about the power of privilege and the privilege of power. I believe that giving up the notion that we deserve to have power over others can lead us in the direction of understanding and appreciating the biggest privilege of all-and that is life. If we give life the reverence it deserves then all living beings fall under its protection. No need for violence, no need to enslave, no need to convince others that being vegan is good for them in terms of health and so on.
many thanks,
Anne

Well put Anne!

With privilege comes responsibility, but unfortunately, in its place is usually self-entitlement. And when that self-entitlement is species-wide, well, the end result ain't pretty.

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

why don't we have a term for hating animals?

 Actually, we do, but it's so little known (I only ran across it myself a while ago) that it hardly even registers in Google search. Try looking for its cousins, and you'll find misogyny (hatred or dislike of women) coming back with a scary 1,640,000 results, misandry (hatred or dislike of men) clocking in at 1,100,000 results, and the more equal-opportunity term misanthropy (something I definitely fall prey to on occasion) yielding 542,000 results. But misothery?  A paltry 1,780 results is all you'll get. 

A shame, really, since the term itself (coined by Jim Mason in 1993) contains the resulting misery for animals right within its letters. I like this term, I really do. And it reminds me of the dangers when we don't have proper names for things so commonplace, so underlying just about everything, and yet so silent. Remember the world-changing effect when Betty Friedan described the problem that has no name? Naming is powerful, necessary, and exciting too.

The word misothery may have an awful ring to it, but I'm glad I found it, and will be adding it to my arsenal of tools to fight animal and human exploitation. Because these two types of exploitation are linked, with the one enabling and the other perhaps begetting, but definitely reinforcing. And who knows, maybe one day, certain acts of animal use and abuse will be seen more widely for what they really are: hate crimes based on species.

p.s. if you agree that this term is a damn fine one, and deserves a wider audience, please help pass it on :) 

Comments

veganelder said...

His book titled The Way We Eat, co-authored with Peter Singer, was one of the first books I read when I went vegan. It was one of the few books my local library had that addressed the how we treated animals.

Misothery...a good catch.

I find it scary that hatred of women gets 500k more hits than hatred of men...and even more scary that hatred of humans only gets a paltry half a million hits.

Maybe we do have a name for animal-hater, however it's not overtly used that way although in practice that's exactly what it is. Meat-eater (or carnivore for those who think it makes them sound tough) or follower of the Standard American Diet...these human animals are animal haters in what they do. Instead we can now call them misotherists. :-)

Thanks for the new term.

have gone vegan said in reply to veganelder...

Would you believe that I just discovered today (I know, I'm awfully late in replying!) that our library no longer carries Peter Singer's Animal Liberation? I was dumbfounded, and worried too, since other animal rights titles that I seem to remember seeing just a couple of years ago are no longer there either. :(

I was surprised as well that misanthropy got substantially fewer results (maybe misanthropist gets more?), since it certainly gets used more often than misandry. And frankly, there are days when it feels like misanthropy is a perfectly logical, rational and emotionally appropriate response to what's happening out there.

Your term carnivore reminded me of how the other day a clerk at the grocery store who knows I'm vegan asked me if I also use the term "carnist" to describe meat-eaters, and I replied that depending on my mood, I certainly do, snort. She and I are friendly acquaintances so she didn't take it to heart, but I was a bit amused by her finding the term itself offensive but NOT the actions that the word describes.

Krissa said...

"it reminds me of the dangers when we don't have proper names for things so commonplace, so underlying just about everything, and yet so silent." ... this was very powerful when I read it and I had thoughts immediately of comments I was going to make until I read the next sentence. And I have to admit, I felt a bit bad that I didn't know anything about Betty Frieden. So I read the link you provided and did some thinking about that, too. As long as women have a choice as to whether or not they are going to be wives, mothers and/or work outside the home, then I think things are ok. It's only if there's not a choice other than to be at home taking care of kids that it's not ok - and I won't point out which cultures in the world are still like this today. But I have a feeling that the sheer fact that it was so expected of a woman back then to aspire to nothing else that that's why so many women were feeling what Betty Frieden wrote about. I'll tell ya what, if we didn't have financial woes from my not being able to work outside the home full-time, I would have no problem whatsoever being a "housewife" (for lack of a better word). I've had so many jobs and the only one I didn't hate was my volunteer job at the shelter. Work to keep a home up and running is hard work and deserving of respect. As I mentioned and I'm sure we can all agree, it's only when it's compulsory that it's a problem.

Now I went on way too long about that part of the post. The term Misothery is new to me, too. But it's a topic I've been thinking on a bit lately in a way. I'll skip some details to keep this to the point, but I've seen so many examples that show how naturally drawn to and caring for other animals that human babies and small children are. It's SICKENING that the natural instinct of our own species to live in peace and harmony with other creatures is squashed for most of us before we get out of childhood. I know that kids in North America are not innocent of this kind of thing entirely, but by about age 8, here in Germany, is when I notice the cut off that children begin to be total ___holes to other animals. That's what Nick remember from his childhood as well. It's pretty common here not just with Germans, but with the large Turkish and other cultures living here. Instead of wondering why this is that we do this to our kids and how it came to be over the centuries, I will just focus on what we can possibly do to change it. Up until now, I've really let kids have it when I see them hitting defenseless little creatures here, teasing and tormenting dogs, etc. I am going to try with all my might next time to talk to them calmly and try to explain to them why what they are doing isn't ok. They're learning their bad behavior at home and from friends and so the influence of an auslander might not be long-lasting or far-reaching, but I can talk easily with children here so I'll give that a try.

Another long rambling comment from me!!! :) Snort! And that wasn't even all I had to say, but I think it's enough. Thanks for another thought-provoking post. :)

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

Language is fascinating, as the words we use not only describe but shape the very experience we are trying to articulate. That's why I find the expression "they're only words" frustrating, cuz they're not. Sorry, George Carlin, but you're wrong, snort.

But don't feel bad about not recognizing the name Betty Friedan. I'm of an age where the women's movement made a profound impact as I was growing up, but like everything else, it goes in cycles. As you said, choice is key, and there are a number of younger women today opting to stay home with kids because they saw first-hand with mothers who worked both in and out of the home (stay-at-home dads will be the first to tell you that what they do IS work) that it's really difficult to be and do everything all at the same time.

Yes, I do think kids in general have a more natural empathy, that unfortunately, often gets indoctrinated right out of them. So you giving them a different perspective is helpful I think. Even if they don't accept it, they may remember it later when they're older, or at least will get to know that not every adult condones animal harm. And if you're good with kids anyway, why not? :)

Bea Elliott said...

You wrote "hate crimes based on species" and this fits accurately into the results of misothery. I love this word/idea! Lots to ponder! Thanks for this post!

have gone vegan said in reply to Bea Elliott...

You're welcome. And thanks. :)

Krissa said...

Just found out about this group: http://www.seashepherd.org/cove-guardians
yesterday. It reminded me of your Captivity is Cruel t-shirt. .. The site has a lot on it that is very emotional, but it's also good to know there are people out there trying to help.

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

Thanks for the link Krissa, I'll check it out. :)

Hi, Misery for animals! That just about sums it up. Thanks for highlighting it.
Anne

Matthew K. Smith said...

so what is a person suffering from misothery, (like my landlord who has a no pets rule and forced me to put my beloved cat in foster care via PAWS)?
a misotherp? now that has a great ring to it! sounds like twerp!
(and i will develop misandry toward him as long as i live here. anus.)

have gone vegan said in reply to Matthew K. Smith...

Hey Matthew, thanks for stopping by, and sorry for the late reply.

Misotherp -- ha ha, love it! As for your landlord, is what he did legal? Here in Ontario Canada, a landlord cannot evict a tenant for having a pet (even if there's a "no pets" clause in a rental agreement), unless the pet is causing damage or is considered inherently dangerous. They can also not force you to get rid of any pet, but I don't know if the legal situation is different where you live. But yeah, he sounds like a real misotherp all right. Sorry you have to put up with him!

Thursday, April 10, 2014

so what does not shaving have to do with veganism?

 Well, back in my I-wish-I-were-a-hippie days (late 80s if I remember correctly), I often wore cotton skirts way below my knees but not quite long enough to hide my hairy legs, and while I wasn't surprised by people being surprised, I was taken aback by the amount of anger it generated. The hair on my legs not only grossed some people out, it really upset them. And while it never bothered anyone that I was in a personal relationship with, I can't tell you the number of strangers (men, women, of all ages) who would approach me and angrily demand to know why I didn't shave. My legs were a personal affront to them, and they sure let me know it. Although it was annoying at the time (and I soon gave up skirts altogether), I was also quite fascinated by the response and tried to figure out what was going on. 

What I had done, of course, was breach public convention and upset the status quo. I had tampered with the notion of what a woman's body should look like and how she should present herself. In short, I had made people uncomfortable. It gave me a taste though of what it might be like to be pregnant and have strangers make remarks about something that is none of their business, or what it would be like to have a visible disability. But while folk don't usually get mad at expectant mothers or people in wheelchairs, choosing to flaunt convention sometimes made me feel I should get ready for a public flogging.

But what specifically does this have to do with veganism? Well, as you already know, daring to be different comes with a price. Seeing someone who doesn't look or eat the way you expect others to look and eat can be upsetting. And if something as innocuous and impersonal as a woman not shaving can send someone right out of their comfort zone (and forget their manners), then you can imagine how charged a topic food can be. While someone can easily dismiss a hairy faux pas, tee hee (after all, if every decent woman knows enough to shave then I don't have to think of this as an issue), eating is a bit too close to home. Most omnivores probably don't think too much about food beyond financial and health implications, and likely rarely consider that there may be political, environmental and animal-welfare consequences of their food choices until they encounter vegans. Seeing or hearing about someone who eats very differently but who belongs to a similar group can be jarring, especially if they do so because they don't want to consume animals. Because what does that imply or say about your own food choices? Not as easy to dismiss anymore.

And remember the popular slogan of the women's movement the personal is political? It was and still is, but the culinary is political too, and perhaps even more so.

===============================

In many ways, femininity really is a social construction. Men, for the most part, are thought of as male without having to do too much extra. Get up, get dressed, get out the door, and you're not likely to be accused of not being masculine enough. Women on the other hand are required to take additional, and I would argue artificial, steps before showing up in public. Remove all body hair except for what grows on your head. Sorry, but if it wasn't natural for hair to grow in certain places, it wouldn't grow there. Head hair needs inordinate amounts of attention to be considered presentable: washed, dried, styled, gelled, sprayed, coloured, tinted, trimmed, and if female, not cut too short. But you're not done yet. Jewelry, accessories, shoes and clothes need to be picked out carefully. Ever notice how fashion shows and magazines are obsessed with women's clothes being feminine enough? But when was the last time you heard men's shirts being referred to as masculine, or that "masculinity" is the trend for this season? And staying away from the topic of cosmetic surgery to "improve" women (a whole post unto itself), what is natural about putting man-made colour onto nails, cheeks, lips and eyelids in order to be thought of as suitably feminine?

Now I'm not arguing here that women shouldn't shave, or pay attention to their hair, or wear makeup, but to just be aware that these are artificial constraints. And that what is considered feminine has been commodified, because sadly, appearance is still viewed as one of the most important aspects of being a woman. When was the last time you saw a female newscaster who wasn't attractive? Who wasn't wearing makeup? Just saying. 

Gosh, haven't had a feminist rant like this in a long time. I feel quite refreshed, snort. Thanks for listening. ;)

You are beautiful

Comments

Joanna said...

Thanks for this terrific, insightful and validating post! I`m so glad I discovered you a few weeks ago (can`t even remember what I was reading that had a link to your blog).

have gone vegan said in reply to Joanna...

Hi Joanna, thank you so much for the compliment, and welcome to the blog! Everyone here is very friendly (even when we disagree), so pop back in any time you like. And thanks again. :)

veganelder said...

Good for you! Oppression is an equal opportunity screwer-over of the less powerful. Opting out of oppressive/oppressed behaviors is always discomfiting to those who continue to participate.

In one scene George C. Scott's character (in that exquisite movie The Hospital) shouted out the window: "Power to the Impotent". I second that.

Or maybe we should begin viewing power like radioactivity. A very small amount might be ok but once it exceeds a certain level...the dangers pretty much seem to outweigh any possible positives. But...we seem to have a real real hard time figuring that out.

have gone vegan said in reply to veganelder...

Yeah, power does funny things to people. Even, sadly, in social justice movements. It may be a cliché, but I do think power corrupts, although fear of losing power may be even more corruptive.

Haven't seen that movie you mentioned. Will check it out.

Odd, too, how difficult it is to see the oppressiveness of certain behaviours, especially when you're still immersed in them. The human animal is pretty blind, eh?

krissa said...

Where to begin... (insert smiley here). ... First I am going to say, I can not BELIEVE people had the nerve to come up to you and say anything about you not shaving your legs! That is truly unheard of in my world so I guess I was lucky. My teenage years were spent in Arkansas and a lot of my black girlfriends didn't shave and while it was noticed, nothing was made of it. A lot of my white girlfriends weren't allowed to shave until they were like 16. Regardless, even after I moved up to the Midwest, I saw women from time to time who didn't shave and no one ever accosted them for it. I'm sure there were nasty remarks made, but not to their face. I am really stunned that people had the audacity to approach you like that. I'm sorry you went through it.

I thought this post was going to be about Gillette (never ever buy any product by Gillette due to 'animal' testing) and other companies whose names I can't think of right now, but instead you really 'brought it' with so much to think about and such excellent observations...I hardly know where to begin. And I don't want to ramble, but I'm sure I will.

The older I've gotten, the less and less the hair on my legs grows to the point that I rarely have to shave. I do because I don't like the feel of it, but I have almost no hair now so it's good. I only buy razors from a couple store brands here who have vegan soap/cosmetics/food and aren't too pricey. The stores themselves aren't vegan, but they do carry all those products. Anyway...

"Most omnivores probably don't think too much about food beyond financial and health implications" - this. This is so important because it shows again how terribly misguided and ignorant folks (like we almost all were at one time) are. It is being proven over and over how unhealthy consuming 'animals' and products stolen from them is and yet people are so entrenched in their beliefs about health *requiring* consumption of said products. One of my brothers' friends from High School raised their kid vegan from birth and last I heard he's almost never even had a cold. He's an extremely healthy kid. But none of my family besides me are vegan, partly because of their belief that animal products are necessary for health.

This whole post was great and I could go on and on, but I won't. You summed it up perfectly and gave me something to think about. (I'm still floored that people were so rude and completely out of line to approach a stranger to scold them about not shaving...although I'm sure you had to pick your battles, I hope you told them where to go!). :)

have gone vegan said in reply to krissa...

Well, you can imagine too that I was a lot younger then and not half as comfortable in my skin as I am now, and I didn't really enjoy being the center of attention, so I'm surprised I lasted as long as I did! I don't even really remember how I responded to people's enquiries, although I'm willing to bet I'd be a lot more assertive now.

Plus, I have to admit that the hair on my legs would put a lot of men's legs to shame, snort. Even hairdressers are always surprised at how thick and fast the hair on my head grows, so it's not like it was barely visible. It was really in their face, and I even got flack from family members, so it wasn't just strangers who were uncomfortable.

Yep, look at all our television commercials even. How many of the food ones are about fruits and vegetables? I see the occasional one advertising produce grown in Ontario, but all the rest are dairy, meat and fast food products, so we almost can't blame folk for believing those are the ones they should be eating.

I try not to be too in-their-face about it these days, and usually wear pants. In the summer I'll shave a few times if I want to wear shorts (but man, what a lot of work!), and always look forward to Fall again. I DO have bigger battles these days, but still think the relationships (intersections I guess) between different traditions or oppressions quite interesting.

In short, what I find fascinating about masculinity and femininity is that basic maleness pretty much qualifies a guy to be considered masculine, but basic femaleness doesn't do the same trick. But I think that's because maleness is considered the norm, so what women essentially end up having to do is prove that they're NOT male or masculine. And that, like my shaving, is a hell of a lot of work. Plus, you can't just do it once. No, you have to do it over and over and you're never done. Unless you opt out. ;)

Tom said...

There are men out there (I am one) who find the absence or presence of body hair absolutely unimportant to the love and connection felt with a female friend, partner, or family member. And I am embarrassed that it's even ever made to be an issue, and like Krissa, I'm angry that anyone gave themselves the right to comment on your choice. Screw 'em.

To this discussion I would also add (I guess it fits in the category of social pressure and commodification) the awful, relentless stream of advertisements telling women (and even, nowadays, men) that there's something wrong with some part of their body that will be fixed with a product for sale, available for sale at your local drugstore or shopping mall. Pills, creams, potions, shampoos, razors, all endlessly hawked by plastic-looking models with fake smiles. As you wrote, ARTIFICIAL CONSTRAINTS. I'm not talking about products that help us maintain basic hygiene, of course, although there are many natural alternatives to the plastic one-use packaging stuff we're told we need to be healthy or attractive to others.

have gone vegan said in reply to Tom...

Hey Tom, glad you're one of the good guys. ;)

I kind of wonder too if I had been a bit more confident in my younger years and exuded more of a I'll-do-what-I-like-and-screw-you aura that perhaps fewer people would have approached me. Hmmm, might make for an interesting experiment this summer, snort.

You're right about all the crap out there and the never-ending barrage of advertising telling us how to improve ourselves. Men, unfortunately, have been targeted too over the last number of years (don't fall for it dudes!), but what really bothers me is how kids are subjected to it as well. I mean, young girls under ten thinking they need to diet? Teenagers getting nose jobs and breast implants? So sad. But it all boils down to money it seems. What a strange world we live in, sigh.

Bea Elliott said...

I was in my early 20's when I first began neglecting my "duties" of conforming to the feminine "norm". Make up just never felt right... Always like a sweaty mask. I wore it less and less and liked the "natural me" more and more... I also became *prematurely* gray well before my 30's. Never took to the bottle though, even against the advice of friends who said it would make me look so much younger. Fiddle-sticks! They are my gray hairs and I earned every one of them!

As to women always having to try harder for approval - Always having to pay-her-way via the script of social demands... We see this exploitation and imbalance in the livestock industries too don't we? As women's beauty is a commodity - Aren't females judged by their scoring condition and their fertility? Makes me shudder to connect the dots - But there they are!

If I could ever give advice to a younger woman... A younger me - I'd tell them to throw out the curling irons and eyebrow pluckers! Cast out the lifters, enhancers, reducers and miracle creams... Life's far too short to waste on someone else's critical eye. We know it's a rigged game anyway... They keep it that way so that authentic female confidence and presence is never achieved. We're distracted from ideas because of being pre-occupied with the way we look! And we'll always know our place because it's just where others tell us that it is. The wise among us know it isn't in shaved legs or polished nails. And for nonhuman females it isn't in how fast they can deliver the next batch of babies... Being female isn't part of a "value-chain"...

Thanks HGV - These issues certainly do merge. And they have equal consequence when we ignore that they do. Feminists would do well to align themselves with vegans as they are part of the same cause against a sucky society!

have gone vegan said in reply to Bea Elliott...

Excellent points (or perhaps I should say dots, ha ha), Bea. Commodification is the name of the game indeed, and is getting stronger I would say as corporations look to expand their reach globally rather than just nationally. Boy do they have voracious appetites!

Great advice for the younger ones among us, and older too. I started going gray in my late 30s but it's just not going fast enough for me. My mom's hair is a beautiful silver white, and I can't wait for my hair to grow into that shade. And no, dying your hair to look younger has just the opposite effect in my opinion -- it's your energy and vitality (going vegan can help with that!) that make you act and look young. Not that that is important per se, but for those who place value on that, something to consider.

Ah, if enough people can connect enough of the dots, our world really would be far less dotty methinks. ;)

Bea Elliott said...

Oh... And the thing about strangers being offended by anything you do on your body??? Let them remain "strange" in the realm of progress and rationality. Old, fossilized, sticks stuck in primordial goo!

have gone vegan said in reply to Bea Elliott...

Ha! Let them remain "strange" -- love that!