Sunday, May 10, 2015

some thoughts on mothering

 By age twelve I had already decided that motherhood wasn't for me, in part because I didn't want to risk subjecting a child to the same kind of screwed-up childhood I was experiencing myself. Imagine my surprise then when decades later I've ended up doing a form of mothering anyway, in a classic case of role reversal with my aging mom. And while there are challenges to taking care of a parent who didn't particularly take good care of you, there are rewards as well. These include closure, working through unresolved issues, grieving a relationship that never was, and providing the kind of nurturing and caring that my younger self craved but didn't receive enough of. And as odd as it may sound, providing this kind of care for someone else is self-nurturing too. I can even see how having had my own kids may have speeded up this healing process, although biologically it's too late for that now. Which isn't to glamorize or minimize any of the hard work involved in taking care of a living being, whether they're eight months old, or eighty-eight years. 

But while today celebrates the role of mothering, I would argue that it's a role we don't really value. We don't define it particularly well, or even give much thought as to whether we should take it on. Folk who opt out of parenthood are often characterized as being selfish and shallow, whereas those who don't give it a second thought, who automatically assume that that's what people do, are lauded as being unselfish and giving. Never mind overpopulation and the various environmental implications. This isn't to say that no one should have kids, but that anyone contemplating having them ought to give serious thought as to the consequences, because not doing so is the actual selfish and shallow act. Parenting, in my view, should be thought of as a privilege rather than a right, and with rights come responsibilities.

Because what other enterprise in our society is as unregulated, unlicensed and unreviewed? Do anything else -- drive a car, buy a gun (in itself an insane act, in my opinion), or enter any number of professions -- and you'll likely need a licence or at least some form of training. But become a parent, and hey, no demonstration of skills or aptitude required. Parenting has to be one of the least paperless activities around, even though it's purported to be the most difficult task there is. Hmmm. 

And as for value, what do we pay people to be parents? To prepare the next generation to become responsible and model citizens? What is this most important work worth? Then compare that to what we pay hockey players, basketball stars, actors, CEO's, and whatever redeeming title you can manage to come up with for anyone whose last name is Kardashian, and it boggles the mind. 

What about all the shelters, programs and services set up for domestic abuse victims? Women and children mainly, although men fall prey as well at times. Take Back The Night has been around forever it seems, and the stats on sexual assault don't appear to be dropping either. So if we value the labour of women when it comes to raising kids so much, why don't we take the man out of the home and off of the street when violence occurs rather than forcing the woman to flee?

And what of this role called mothering? What does it mean to be a mother? We don't spell it out clearly enough methinks, but to my mind mothering involves nurturing, raising, protecting, teaching, guiding, caring, playing, helping, mentoring, setting a good example and being an effective role model. 

What about fathering? Not a term we hear as often as mothering, but surely it also means protecting, raising, caring, guiding, nurturing, helping, setting a good example, teaching, playing and being an effective mentor and role model. Notice that all of these attributes are shared by both male and female parents, although unfortunately the onus is still on mothers to do the lion's share of raising kids. Because when are men ever asked, for example, how they'll combine childcare and work?

Notice too that all the qualities of being a good (or good enough) parent are not species-specific. If we really value mothering, shouldn't we recognize and respect the mother-child bond wherever it occurs? Take a look at any undercover footage of factory farming, and you'll see just how much we actually value mothering.  Sadly, as with human mothering, not that much.

But veganism can change that. Does change that. And to end this post on a positive note, here's a video of a fabulous new mother, and a nod to two human dads who prove that nurturing, protecting and providing is everyone's job, although these two do it particularly well. 

Comments

veganelder said...

Hooray for you...for everything! :-)

I was just thinking about this caring stuff the other day, one of the bunnies who lives with us has a neurological problem with one back leg and can't get around at all. Part of caring means a butt bath daily. I've come to truly appreciate the self-nurturing (your word...a good one) aspects of caring for her. At first I dreaded it, now it is one of the best parts of the day (for me...she's not too happy about it...but tolerates it). The stuff about giving to get has more power than we often appreciate.

Give you a hug from me please. :-)

have gone vegan said in reply to veganelder...

Hug taken, thank you! :)

Bunny butt baths, hmmm. My first thought was, rather you than me, but it's amazing what we can end up doing for our loved ones that we initially likely could not even have envisioned ourselves capable of.

As for giving (which of course you can do in so many different ways), I'm currently reading Peter Singer's The Most Good You Can Do, a book about effective altruism. Thought it might be interesting to explore the best possible ways to give (especially financially) when resources are limited. And apparently Nick Cooney has just written on the same subject.

Krissa said...

This is so well written and encompasses so much of so many things I have thought and felt myself. Thank you for putting it into words so well.

For reasons too many to go into, I will leave my thoughts about human mothering out of this. But I will say that it is so sad to me that our species is the one and only species that I know of that deprives other mothers and their children of their place as mother and child in so many different ways.

I've been having massive computer problems and the link you have on here isn't "blue", but I'm going to copy/paste it. I'm not on Facebook though so not sure I'll be able to see it, but thanks for sharing anyway because I'm sure it's well worth watching.

There's more I could write, but it wouldn't add anything to what you wrote so I will leave it at, this is a great post!

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

Thanks Krissa! :)

Yeah, it's sad isn't it, that our species is so callous when it comes to dividing mothers and children, even though it's the only species that can actually name the bond it destroys.

Sorry to hear about the computer problems. Might I suggest that you keep either Esther's or the sanctuary page open in a separate window? That way it'll be easier to have a peek whenever you need a lift! :)

Krissa said...

OH!!! I was hoping it might be Esther! Her family is so awesome!!! Thanks for the video!! I'm missing some of it as I type so I'll re-watch!!! :)

Krissa said in reply to Krissa...

Happily Ever Esther...:) I sure hope you can go visit them some day. ... It was so nice to see (I can't get the audio on this computer, if there is any) the wonderful life that Esther and her family have been able to give others. :)

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

Me too! :)

Aw, no audio? That's sometimes the best part of the videos as Steve (he's usually the narrator) has a great voice and an infectious laugh to go with it.

Krissa said in reply to have gone vegan...

I'm so glad I checked to see if you'd replied because in the meantime, I dug through the basement and got some cheap speakers out to get audio on here. The only way to get audio on this laptop is through the output and, having destroyed many a pair of ear buds using them to get through the nights and to sometimes fall asleep....I didn't have any way to hear it, but now I do. And now I know that the independent little one is Peggy. :) I love their voices. :) Happiness has a sound, eh? :)

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

Yep, it sure does. And it's so nice to watch their happy family grow. Have no idea how they do everything they all do within 24 hours (although I suspect they have a strong support network), so it's even more amazing that they manage to keep their many online Esther-addicted fans media-fed as well! ;)

Hi Friend,

Ah yes, the subject of parenting-no great manual for that. We just all think that we will do a better job than our parents did. I am extremely fortunate to have been loved by a wonderful mom, who is never far from my thoughts. This is not the case for my father, who was not a good human being or husband or father. But yet, I grew up wanting to be a mother more than anything else in this world. And being a grandmother is an added bonus.

But parenting is not for everyone, that is for sure. I think it is a very unselfish act to make the decision not to have children if it is not right for oneself.

I believe that the violence we show to mothers and families of other species is as Dr Tuttle says, directly related to our meat eating culture of domination. We cannot be peaceful and loving and kind in our own lives when we are perpetrating such atrocities, whether we are perpetrating the abuse or paying for it.

Dr Tuttle goes on the say that the beginning of herding signaled the beginning of the subjugation of the Sacred Feminine and I think this is true. Women, Femininity and Motherhood used to be revered. Until we get back to that we can not expect any kind of viable peace on earth.

I met Esther's two dads at the First Annual Veg Fest in Montreal, QC, Canada this past September. The story of loving Esther and then becoming vegan the moment they sat down to another breakfast of bacon is life altering. The change was instantaneous and now they are developing a Farmed Animal Sanctuary in Ontario. This is heartwarming and beautiful. These stories give me hope.

Thank you for a very thoughtful post.
Take care.
Anne

And thank you for your thoughtful comment! :)

Ah yes, love the two dads. Their story and their compassion and method of advocacy give me hope as well. And if their personalities are the same offline as they are online, then I'm even more impressed. I really don't have their level of patience, and would likely be far more snarky with, for example, all the questions they continually get bombarded with. No, those two are ideally suited to building and maintaining both a sanctuary and a strong social media presence, AND (unlike myself) being effective and snark-free advocates and educators.


Friday, January 16, 2015

privilege

 Take a minute, and without thinking about it too much, quickly list all the different ways in which you're privileged. Better yet, do it out loud. 

Now, did you find this relatively easy, or were you a bit stumped after the first couple of more obvious privileges? If you're like most of us, you were a bit slower in rattling off the last items you came up with, and that's not surprising given the nature of privilege. Privilege tends to be relatively invisible to the privilege-holder, that is, we often don't even see the advantages that come with the particular type of privilege we enjoy. And we all enjoy numerous privileges we take for granted.

If you are currently reading this post, then you enjoy heaps of privilege right off the bat. You have time, and are likely not working in multiple part-time jobs (or sweatshops) in trying to make ends meet. You have some kind of device on which you're reading these very words, and are probably living somewhere without Internet censorship. Almost certainly, you have some level of post-secondary education, or are self-taught. Already, as you can see, you are hugely privileged.

Statistically, many of you are enjoying gender privilege (it's easier, by the way, for vegans to pay lip service to the idea of being nonsexist than it is to recognize how certain approaches that value linear or black and white thinking, or reason over emotion, may actually be rooted in sexism), racial privilege, and heterosexual privilege. What may not be as easy to see is that you likely also enjoy gender identity privilege, Judeo-Christian privilege, and able-bodied privilege. If you fit the norms of whatever is considered attractive and desirable in your culture or society, than that's privilege too.

So right away, we have all sorts of privilege that we may not even be that aware of: gender, gender identity, class, racial, economic, technological, religious, education, orientation, and so forth -- it's a bit staggering, isn't it? Which isn't to say that anyone is completely privileged, as we're all probably marginalized in one area or another, and as with anything, it's a matter of degree.

But the one enormous privilege that the vast majority of us (even those of us who can easily recognize all sorts of other privileges) don't see, is the privilege conferred on human animals. In fact, this privilege is rendered so invisible that those of us who do see the anthropocentrism for what it is are usually accused of anthropomorphism. In other words, our world is so human-centric that many cannot recognize other sentient beings as beings in their own right, and dismiss veganism as an attempt to attribute human emotions and characteristics as if those emotions and traits can only be human. It's as if most humans cannot view members of other species but through a human-specific and human-oriented lens. Quite the disability, if you ask me. ;)

My friend veganelder has also been pondering this most peculiar inability, so I would invite you to read here, here, and here.

Please do think a bit more about the notion of privilege, the extent of your own particular set of privileges, how you can help those with fewer privileges, and how you can help other humans actually see the privilege-tinted lenses they wear. Thanks.

Oh, because privilege can be hard to think about objectively when you're the one enjoying its benefits, here are a few nifty lists of examples to make it a bit clearer:

So all we need now is for someone to write a 30+ examples of human privilege list. Sadly, it shouldn't be too difficult. 

Comments

Krissa said...

I thought about VE right before you mentioned him in this post. :) ... This is something I have thought about I have no idea how many times, especially lately. I usually don't think of it in relation to things like gender privilege or the others you mentioned (and I'll check out the links!)...it's in my mind so often how much power our unworthy species has over all others. It is too much for my mind to actually comprehend if I really concentrate on it. It is the ultimate privilege to be born human on this planet and I have no idea how 'we' managed to pull this off. Instead of rambling off all the examples I see every day, I'll just say that I remember when I was a kid being told that "privileges are something you earn". Ha. Of course in the context of being allowed to do something you want to do because you did something you didn't want to (chores, etc.) they can make that fly. But our species has absolutely NOT earned the privilege that we have over everyone else. And here I go but, once again we have organized religion to in great part thank for this.

Glad to see you were able to post again! Some worthwhile things to consider here!

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

Thanks Krissa. I'm trying to keep the goals I actually didn't set (the idea being that if I DON'T set them I may have better luck), with one of them being to make/take the time to write even when I feel I don't have it. The funny thing though is that every time I DO post, I have at least one person unsubscribe within the hour, so I guess that means I'm doing something wrong, or actually something very right, snort.

I'm afraid though that it may have come across in this post that I'm completely enlightened when it comes to privilege, and that I recognize my various sorts of privilege and their consequences at all times, which is patently not the case. I'm as privilege-blind as everyone else more times than I'm comfortable with, but I think it's a concept that's useful and important, especially for vegans or anyone working to end oppression of any kind. Because if you don't see how seemingly different types of oppression are similar and interconnected (that is, the roots are the same but the affected party may be different), then you won't be as effective in whatever advocacy work you're doing.

And I agree that the human species has not earned its privilege, although it certainly is enjoying/abusing it to the detriment of others.

Krissa said in reply to have gone vegan...

That's wacky about the un-subs! It must be folks who don't even check the post out and just unsubscribe because they feel like they're getting too many emails. ? I unsubscribed to a few things lately because I was just getting way too many petitions and a good number of them nothing I would have been interested in. I just can't imagine anyone unsubbing after reading your posts!

Yep, our species hasn't earned any of the rights and privileges we enjoy and abuse. It's just nice and sanity-saving to know that there are some examples of humanity that are doing what they can to make things better for everyone else.

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

Ha ha, you're probably right, and it likely has nothing even to do with me. Taking things personally has never been one of my finer qualities, snort.

And yes, those examples are what I cling to, and try to remember or view daily. :)

veganelder said...

I'm heartened to see that this privilege notion is of interest to you. That list of links you offer is a great resource to provoke some (maybe disturbing) thinking. Thank you.

I'm really struggling with all this stuff...I find it to be disturbing and powerful and disorienting...all at the same time and that's often really uncomfortable. Jeez, no wonder we tend to stay away from looking at notions of privilege and oppression except in some more superficial ways.

It's tough...thanks for writing about this.

have gone vegan said in reply to veganelder...

It's tough indeed. Veganism isn't just about giving up consuming other animals, it's about giving up power over others, all others. It's turned out to be a tad more complicated than I thought when I went vegan nearly seven years ago, snort.

Hi Friend,
Powerful post about the power of privilege and the privilege of power. I believe that giving up the notion that we deserve to have power over others can lead us in the direction of understanding and appreciating the biggest privilege of all-and that is life. If we give life the reverence it deserves then all living beings fall under its protection. No need for violence, no need to enslave, no need to convince others that being vegan is good for them in terms of health and so on.
many thanks,
Anne

Well put Anne!

With privilege comes responsibility, but unfortunately, in its place is usually self-entitlement. And when that self-entitlement is species-wide, well, the end result ain't pretty.

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

why don't we have a term for hating animals?

 Actually, we do, but it's so little known (I only ran across it myself a while ago) that it hardly even registers in Google search. Try looking for its cousins, and you'll find misogyny (hatred or dislike of women) coming back with a scary 1,640,000 results, misandry (hatred or dislike of men) clocking in at 1,100,000 results, and the more equal-opportunity term misanthropy (something I definitely fall prey to on occasion) yielding 542,000 results. But misothery?  A paltry 1,780 results is all you'll get. 

A shame, really, since the term itself (coined by Jim Mason in 1993) contains the resulting misery for animals right within its letters. I like this term, I really do. And it reminds me of the dangers when we don't have proper names for things so commonplace, so underlying just about everything, and yet so silent. Remember the world-changing effect when Betty Friedan described the problem that has no name? Naming is powerful, necessary, and exciting too.

The word misothery may have an awful ring to it, but I'm glad I found it, and will be adding it to my arsenal of tools to fight animal and human exploitation. Because these two types of exploitation are linked, with the one enabling and the other perhaps begetting, but definitely reinforcing. And who knows, maybe one day, certain acts of animal use and abuse will be seen more widely for what they really are: hate crimes based on species.

p.s. if you agree that this term is a damn fine one, and deserves a wider audience, please help pass it on :) 

Comments

veganelder said...

His book titled The Way We Eat, co-authored with Peter Singer, was one of the first books I read when I went vegan. It was one of the few books my local library had that addressed the how we treated animals.

Misothery...a good catch.

I find it scary that hatred of women gets 500k more hits than hatred of men...and even more scary that hatred of humans only gets a paltry half a million hits.

Maybe we do have a name for animal-hater, however it's not overtly used that way although in practice that's exactly what it is. Meat-eater (or carnivore for those who think it makes them sound tough) or follower of the Standard American Diet...these human animals are animal haters in what they do. Instead we can now call them misotherists. :-)

Thanks for the new term.

have gone vegan said in reply to veganelder...

Would you believe that I just discovered today (I know, I'm awfully late in replying!) that our library no longer carries Peter Singer's Animal Liberation? I was dumbfounded, and worried too, since other animal rights titles that I seem to remember seeing just a couple of years ago are no longer there either. :(

I was surprised as well that misanthropy got substantially fewer results (maybe misanthropist gets more?), since it certainly gets used more often than misandry. And frankly, there are days when it feels like misanthropy is a perfectly logical, rational and emotionally appropriate response to what's happening out there.

Your term carnivore reminded me of how the other day a clerk at the grocery store who knows I'm vegan asked me if I also use the term "carnist" to describe meat-eaters, and I replied that depending on my mood, I certainly do, snort. She and I are friendly acquaintances so she didn't take it to heart, but I was a bit amused by her finding the term itself offensive but NOT the actions that the word describes.

Krissa said...

"it reminds me of the dangers when we don't have proper names for things so commonplace, so underlying just about everything, and yet so silent." ... this was very powerful when I read it and I had thoughts immediately of comments I was going to make until I read the next sentence. And I have to admit, I felt a bit bad that I didn't know anything about Betty Frieden. So I read the link you provided and did some thinking about that, too. As long as women have a choice as to whether or not they are going to be wives, mothers and/or work outside the home, then I think things are ok. It's only if there's not a choice other than to be at home taking care of kids that it's not ok - and I won't point out which cultures in the world are still like this today. But I have a feeling that the sheer fact that it was so expected of a woman back then to aspire to nothing else that that's why so many women were feeling what Betty Frieden wrote about. I'll tell ya what, if we didn't have financial woes from my not being able to work outside the home full-time, I would have no problem whatsoever being a "housewife" (for lack of a better word). I've had so many jobs and the only one I didn't hate was my volunteer job at the shelter. Work to keep a home up and running is hard work and deserving of respect. As I mentioned and I'm sure we can all agree, it's only when it's compulsory that it's a problem.

Now I went on way too long about that part of the post. The term Misothery is new to me, too. But it's a topic I've been thinking on a bit lately in a way. I'll skip some details to keep this to the point, but I've seen so many examples that show how naturally drawn to and caring for other animals that human babies and small children are. It's SICKENING that the natural instinct of our own species to live in peace and harmony with other creatures is squashed for most of us before we get out of childhood. I know that kids in North America are not innocent of this kind of thing entirely, but by about age 8, here in Germany, is when I notice the cut off that children begin to be total ___holes to other animals. That's what Nick remember from his childhood as well. It's pretty common here not just with Germans, but with the large Turkish and other cultures living here. Instead of wondering why this is that we do this to our kids and how it came to be over the centuries, I will just focus on what we can possibly do to change it. Up until now, I've really let kids have it when I see them hitting defenseless little creatures here, teasing and tormenting dogs, etc. I am going to try with all my might next time to talk to them calmly and try to explain to them why what they are doing isn't ok. They're learning their bad behavior at home and from friends and so the influence of an auslander might not be long-lasting or far-reaching, but I can talk easily with children here so I'll give that a try.

Another long rambling comment from me!!! :) Snort! And that wasn't even all I had to say, but I think it's enough. Thanks for another thought-provoking post. :)

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

Language is fascinating, as the words we use not only describe but shape the very experience we are trying to articulate. That's why I find the expression "they're only words" frustrating, cuz they're not. Sorry, George Carlin, but you're wrong, snort.

But don't feel bad about not recognizing the name Betty Friedan. I'm of an age where the women's movement made a profound impact as I was growing up, but like everything else, it goes in cycles. As you said, choice is key, and there are a number of younger women today opting to stay home with kids because they saw first-hand with mothers who worked both in and out of the home (stay-at-home dads will be the first to tell you that what they do IS work) that it's really difficult to be and do everything all at the same time.

Yes, I do think kids in general have a more natural empathy, that unfortunately, often gets indoctrinated right out of them. So you giving them a different perspective is helpful I think. Even if they don't accept it, they may remember it later when they're older, or at least will get to know that not every adult condones animal harm. And if you're good with kids anyway, why not? :)

Bea Elliott said...

You wrote "hate crimes based on species" and this fits accurately into the results of misothery. I love this word/idea! Lots to ponder! Thanks for this post!

have gone vegan said in reply to Bea Elliott...

You're welcome. And thanks. :)

Krissa said...

Just found out about this group: http://www.seashepherd.org/cove-guardians
yesterday. It reminded me of your Captivity is Cruel t-shirt. .. The site has a lot on it that is very emotional, but it's also good to know there are people out there trying to help.

have gone vegan said in reply to Krissa...

Thanks for the link Krissa, I'll check it out. :)

Hi, Misery for animals! That just about sums it up. Thanks for highlighting it.
Anne

Matthew K. Smith said...

so what is a person suffering from misothery, (like my landlord who has a no pets rule and forced me to put my beloved cat in foster care via PAWS)?
a misotherp? now that has a great ring to it! sounds like twerp!
(and i will develop misandry toward him as long as i live here. anus.)

have gone vegan said in reply to Matthew K. Smith...

Hey Matthew, thanks for stopping by, and sorry for the late reply.

Misotherp -- ha ha, love it! As for your landlord, is what he did legal? Here in Ontario Canada, a landlord cannot evict a tenant for having a pet (even if there's a "no pets" clause in a rental agreement), unless the pet is causing damage or is considered inherently dangerous. They can also not force you to get rid of any pet, but I don't know if the legal situation is different where you live. But yeah, he sounds like a real misotherp all right. Sorry you have to put up with him!